« Amazon.Com’s Strongest Holiday Season | Main | HDTV Trends to Expect at CES 2009 »

December 30, 2008

Review - Sharp Aquos Limited Edition LC-52XS1U-S

0,1425,i=227549,00

An LCD HDTV's ability to produce richly saturated colors largely depends on the quality of its backlight module. LCD backlights continue to improve, transitioning from spectrum-limited fluorescents to wide-gamut varieties. And now, light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are poised to be the next step for premium backlight designs. The 52-inch Sharp Aquos Limited Edition LC-52XS1U-S ($11,999 list) is the company's first LCD to use LED-based backlights. The result is impressively colorful imagery that was, initially, too colorful for accurate representation of broadcast HDTV or Blu-ray video material. I was disappointed to find that the LC-52XS1U-S's out-of-the-box picture quality demands professional calibration, and even then the provided picture controls weren't as effective as I would have expected from a TV with a five-digit list price. For $12,000, I'd say that's pretty unacceptable. 


    * Price as Tested: $11,999.00 List
    * Screen Size: 52 inches
    * Type: LCD TV, LCD Monitor, HDTV
    * Native Resolution: 1920 x 1080
    * Supported Video Formats: 480p, 720p, 1080i, 480i, 1080p60, 1080p24
    * Supported Refresh Rates: 48Hz, 120Hz
    * Widescreen: Yes
    * Aspect Ratio: 16:9
    * Video Inputs: Component, Composite, HDMI, RF, S-Video
    * PC Interfaces: Analog VGA, HDMI
    * Networking Options: Ethernet
    * Built-in TV Tuner: NTSC, ATSC, QAM
    * 120Hz (LCD) technology: Yes
    * USB Ports: 1
    * EnergyStar Compliance: Yes

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54fa2c2ba8834010536a53931970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Review - Sharp Aquos Limited Edition LC-52XS1U-S:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment